Thunder & Lightnings

Supermarine Scimitar

Model Kits

History Survivors Profiles Gallery Walkaround Models Links, References & Credits

A brief rundown of the various model kits available of the Scimitar. Sadly, the Scimitar has not been well served in scale form.

1/144

Welsh Models PJW12 Scimitar F.1

1/144

Vacuum formed plastic

Price £12.08 (RRP)

Released 1990s?

3 stars

Fairly well detailed for the scale, overall shape looks a bit off with nose too slim and pointy and a slightly curved line to the top of the fuselage where it should be straight.

1/72

Skybirds '86 Scimitar box

Skybirds '86 Scimitar

1/72

Mixed media

Price £30+ (second hand)

Released 1991

4 stars

This kit was a limited run mixed media kit, mostly short run injection moulded plastic but with a good amount of white metal parts and a vacform canopy and some etched brass details. It is reputedly the best representation of the Scimitar available in this scale, and certainly the built-up examples I have seen look to have good outline accuracy (the nose and canopy look much better than the CMR kit below). Sadly, being limited run, it is very rare and tends to attract quite a price premium. With the release of the Xtrakit model, the second hand prices on this kit seem to have reduced - thankfully! If anybody wants to let me have one for a reasonable sum, I'm listening!

With the parts sized to fit into the small injection moulding equipment available, the parts breakdown is rather unusual but seems to work well. The plastic parts are cleanly moulded with nicely done recessed detail. A large number of metal parts cover the undercarriage, cockpit, nose tip, intakes and exhaust areas and are unusually clean for metal castings. The canopy, wing fences and exhaust blanking plates are in vacform plastic; the instrument panel and airbrakes are etched brass (a weak point - no way to show them open, and careful work is needed to bend the airbrake section into place so it sits in the fuselage recess - the rear end of the brakes are curved but the front end is flat!). No wing fold detail, though cut lines are marked on the interior of the wing parts if you want to model the wings folded. None of the control surfaces are separate. Decals are provided for no fewer than 7 different aircraft with a good variety of schemes, and separate white backdrops to any item with a white area (a great idea when applying markings on a dark grey background!). In terms of fit this is no 'shake and bake' kit and needs some careful work, but extensive instructions are provided so as long as you follow them you should be okay.

Build thread here.

Xtrakit Scimitar box

Xtrakit XK72011 Scimitar F.1

1/72

Injection moulded plastic

Price £18.50 (RRP)

Released 2009

3 stars

At long last a relatively mainstream injection moulded kit of the Scimitar! Alas, while it appears to be an improvement on the Xtrakit/MPM Sea Vixen, poor research, poor quality control and the whiff of profiteering mar this product. Many examples of the kit exhibit a scar running down the intake and nose side of one of the fuselage halves, which appear to indicate the mould had cracked but no effort was made to repair it and instead they just pushed out a load of flawed kits. The price is, as usual, over the top for what you get.

As for the kit itself, well you get basically nothing in the way of cockpit detail (just a poorly done instrument panel); no undercarriage bay detail (indeed, no bays at all for the main gear); an inaccurate seat (clearly modelled on a partially-equipped museum piece), no wing fold option, no open airbrake option (they're moulded solid - and with no perforations either), no poseable control surfaces, basic undercarriage, four of the later style pylons plus four drop tanks - no weapons or other stores of any kind. The nose shape appears to be somewhere between the early more rounded nose and the definitive more pointy one (closer to the latter). A basic IFR probe is supplied. The top of the fin, ends of the rear stabilisers and outer mainplane shapes all look like they could do with a bit of adjustment to accurately match the real thing. The fairings behind the exhausts are too shallow, though should be easy to build up with filler, and the rear end of the fuselage is the wrong shape and too short, as even the most cursory comparison with photos of the real thing would show you - a truly bizarre error. The arrestor hook and tail bumper are crudely done. The area ruling of the fuselage sides is thankfully there, but should be a bit more pronounced - hopefully easy enough to fix with some additional sanding down. Only two of the gun ports are moulded open (and are far too shallow), the other two are faired over (presumably based on a preserved example). Several small intakes/vents/panel lines are wrong. In general the parts exhibit the same sort of surface flaws and flash evident in other MPM/Xtrakit products, and injection pins on mating surfaces that will need to be thoroughly removed if you want the parts to actually fit together.

Two decal options are provided - however the instructions title both of them incorrectly - first is XD321 coded '112/E' (which would be XD268) when the decals are for '116/E' (which is indeed XD321, during summer 1966). For the second one it says XD332 is coded '192/R' and from 'HMS Ark Royal, at RNAS Hal Far, Malta, 1960-61', when the decals show '194/C'. The former would make it XD319; the latter would not have been at Hal Far in 1960, nor did it wear these markings at that time (possibly it visited in 1961 - but at that time it had no IFR probe). The 194 code on the nose should be black with a white outline, not blue, same for the '4' on the nose wheel door (which is also the wrong style) - these decals actually represent the aircraft as it is now, having been incorrectly painted for display at RIAT a few years back. Interestingly the old CMR kit has options for XD268/112/E and XD319/192/R... please tell me the research consisted of more than copying their kit!

On the plus side the overall shape - on the sprues at least - looks to be good; the dimensions scale out nicely; there's a fair stab at the intakes with better looking engine faces than in the Sea Vixen kit; as usual, finely done panel line detail - and of course, finally, we have a Scimitar kit that won't cost an absolute arm and a leg (just an arm). If it were around the ten quid mark I wouldn't have any hesitation in recommending it despite the work needed to bring it up to scratch - however, at this price, we should expect a better product. I'm not sure Hannants/Xtrakit care or if they are listening to feedback, though, based on the chain of inaccurate and poor quality mouldings stretching from their Canberra PR.9 through to their Sea Vixen, Sea Harrier and now this kit. Just a little more effort and they'd have happy customers instead of moaning ones!

Build thread here with finished result here.

CMR Scimitar boxes

Czech Model Resins CMR-221/222/224 Scimitar

1/72

Resin

Price £79.99 (RRP, yes, that's right)

Released 2011

3 stars

CMR's second bite at the Scimitar cherry is a vast improvement over their first attempt, but it's hugely expensive for a fairly small 1/72 jet. Can it possibly justify the astronomical price tag? CMR have addressed many of the failings of their original model; this one now has seperate wing flaps, airbrakes that can be displayed open (and they really are beautifully done), a much better cockpit, intakes, arrestor hook and bay, gear bays etc. The panel lines are more accurate (though several minor errors are still evident from a brief comparison with photos of the real thing). The decals are much improved too, with full stencil detail and a wider selection of options. The box certainly looks like a little treasure trove what with the collection of finely cast resin bits, etched brass, gorgeous decals and sheet upon sheet of paper covering assembly, colour schemes and detail photos.

The new kit is available in three different boxings; 'Scimitar F.1' (CMR-221), 'Photo Reconnaissance' (CMR-222) and 'Early Production (CMR-224)'. The box contents differ mostly in the decal sheets and stores provision. The standard F.1 version includes 4 x 1,000lb bombs, 1 x Red Beard atomic bomb, 4 x drop tanks (two different sizes), 2 Sidewinders, loads of rockets and practice bombs. The photo recon version misses out on all of the bombs (bar the practice ones) and rockets but adds another pair of drop tanks in another size, a HDU, 2 x Bullpup missiles and 2 x Sidewinder practice rounds; it also includes a camera pod as used by one particular trials aircraft. The PR nosecone is catered for by having the modeller drill out the camera ports (sides, tip and below) and pushing in clear resin inserts. There is also a Harley light option where you cut the tip of the nose off completely and replace it - unfortunately it's the wrong shape (domed rather than flat - that would be with the eyelids closed, so no need for a transparent part). The early production version misses out on the Sidewinders, bombs (except practice ones), rockets and HDU but has adds another type of practice bomb and a portable air starter pod.

However, I fear CMR have snatched defeat from the jaws of victory once again. While we now have seperate wing trailing edge flaps, what about the fuselage and wing leading edge flaps? Scimitars would use all three sets on approach, so you can't model them in that configuration. So can you model them in take-off configuration? Again, no. That would normally be both sets of wing flaps, with fuselage flaps retracted. Also there is, once again, no wing fold option. A wing fold set can be bought seperately, but it costs another £22.50 or so - bringing the cost up to over £100! And it still does not offer seperate leading edge flaps. Then there is the question of the nose shape. The old kit was obviously wrong, being too short; the new kit seems to have got that right for the F.1 and F.1(PR) versions, but the early production version should have a noticeably more bulbous nose, and CMR's new kit doesn't appear to have got that right at all. Also, the canopy on all three kits has been messed up big time; the sliding portion should sit much lower than the windscreen portion, but on the kit they are both at the same level. The result of this is that the sliding part isn't high enough, and the curvature is off too, being too bulbous at the rear. This really throws off the look of the nose area and won't be an easy fix. So, worth more than a hundred notes? Not a chance - and loses one star for the price alone.

CMR Scimitar bag

Czech Model Resins CMR-126 Scimitar F.1 (original issue)

1/72

Resin

Price £20+ (second hand)

Released 2002

3 stars

The subject of several gushing reviews when it came out, this resin kit was an expensive disappointment. No longer in production it is readily available second hand. The illustration on the box/bag shows a built up kit with folded wings and cockpit access ladder, with practice bomb carriers on the pylons - however neither the ladder, nor a folded wing option, nor practice bomb carriers are provided for in the kit. The canopy shape is incorrect, and the entire nose shape is off too (the underside curve and a shortage in length being the main culprit). The area ruled waisting of the fuselage is barely represented. Gear bays are shallow and featureless. The supplied Sidewinders are inaccurate and in my copy at least are poorly moulded and thus unuseable anyway. Flaps, slats, main gear doors and airbrakes are all moulded closed and would be extremely difficult to model open as a result. The decal sheet looks good but they are thin and brittle so require care to use, and white backing decals would be a good idea for the roundels in particular. There are some errors e.g. style of lettering in small serials and blade colour on the 804 NAS badges.

A good honest build article and review can be found here.

Magna Scimitar box

Magna Models 7238 Scimitar F.1

1/72

Resin

Price ~£20 (second hand)

Released 1990s?

2 stars

My general experience with Magna products are that they are a bit basic and the casting quality can be poor. No decals are provided. While I have not seen this kit myself, the canopy and fuselage shape is apparently more accurate than the old CMR kit though the general level of detail is much cruder. It appears to be out of production and does not show up very often second hand.

Frog Scimitar box

Frog N113 Scimitar

1/72

Injection moulded plastic

Price £30+ (second hand)

Released 1960s

2 stars

A real rarity these days, and very much a collectors' item, fetching extremely high prices when it does pop up from time to time on eBay. I have yet to find one at a reasonable price and comments are based on a built-up example. The kit represents the first Type 544/N113D of around September 1956 rather than a production F.1, with short spine fairing (but a rounded nose rather than the original nose with long pitot fairing). It is a very basic kit in terms of detail - there is no cockpit for instance, just a pilot's head and seat top sticking up out of a blank deck. No undercarriage bays, the crude undercarriage parts just go into slots on the underside. There is no intake interior so you can see right through to the jetpipes - and to the intake on the other side! The overall shape is actually pretty good, though the area ruling is completely missing from the fuselage. The canopy is a little squashed looking with overly thick frames. The fillet aft of the exhausts is rather short - more like that on the Supermarine 508. Decals cover one aircraft - WT854 (which is correct), but are pretty poor quality.

Contrail Scimitar bag

Contrail Scimitar

1/72

Low pressure injection moulded plastic

Price £5 (second hand)

Released 1980s

1 stars

Ancient, crude, lacking in any detail whatsoever and inaccurate in shape (fuselage cross section too rounded and misses the area ruling, port and starboard wings different sizes from each other). No decals. Much scratch building required. Fit only for the bin really, these days.

Merlin Models Scimitar

1/72

Low pressure injection moulded plastic

Price £5 (second hand)

Released 1980s

0 stars

Like other Merlin kits, basically pretty awful - misshapen parts, no detail at all, and a challenge to even get the supplied bits together to look like any aircraft, let alone a Scimitar.

1/48

Dynavector DYN004 Scimitar F.1

1/48

Mixed media

Price ~£85 (imported from Japan) or ~£20 to 40 (second hand)

Released 1990s

3 stars

This used to be pretty good value direct from Dynavector in Japan, until the exchange rates went bonkers. Fairly well detailed, it requires a certain amount of modelling skill to get the best out of it. The painting instructions and decals for the powder blue and white RAE example are wrong in colour and layout. Accuracy of the model itself looks to be good. However, this is one of Dynavector's simpler kits and offers little in the way of additional detail; you are on your own when it comes to deploying the flaps, folding the wings, and so on. Panel lines are all finely recessed - a little too finely, many will disappear with any sanding work at all, and the various intakes, vents and grilles are inadequately represented by such shallow lines. Gear doors are very simplistic, as is the undercarriage. This one is more of a fine blank canvas than a really complete package, and the errors in the decals/paint schemes are unfortunate.

Build thread here. Build article/review (in French).

Sanger Scimitar boxNimbus Scimitar box

Contrail / Sanger / Nimbus CON405 Scimitar F.1

1/48

Vacuum formed plastic

Price £20 (RRP)

Released 1990s?

2 stars

Somewhat crude, though the basic shape is pretty good and it includes the area ruled fuselage. The intakes are a bit too small and the canopy shape, particularly around the windscreen is very odd. Undercarriage in white metal and also rather basic. Decals are just roundels and codes, no stencils. Clearly inferior to the Dynavector product although it is at least much cheaper! Originally issued by Contrail it has also been boxed by Sanger and Nimbus.

'Inbox' review (in German) here.

1/32 and larger

None available that I know of.

Share via Twitter   Facebook   Email   Other

Site contents copyright © 2012 Damien Burke/Handmade by Machine Ltd.
This page last updated on Monday 23rd January 2012

Visitor Comments

10 people have commented on this page. This is comment section 1 of 1.

Slim Hewitt from Llanelli Flag

Posted at 11:52pm on Friday, June 17th, 2011

Having slaved not (worked) on the Scimitar at 9 hangar RNAS Brawdy fitting harley lights to two airframes before they were scrapped, where on your models are the seven (7) trip trays that each beast required to avoid flooding the hangar?

Chas Chambers from Burnham on Sea Flag

Posted at 6:31pm on Monday, December 27th, 2010

Sorry - having a senior moment. The radar should have read "Blue Silk". Blue Parrot was Buccaneer

Chas Chambers from Burnham on Sea Flag

Posted at 6:25pm on Monday, December 27th, 2010

Two of the 30mm cannon(port side I think) were removed and replaced with the (blue Parrot??)radar installation

John Makin from Plymouth Flag

Posted at 12:55pm on Sunday, August 15th, 2010

Reference the Merlin Scimitar, I found a kit recently and is most certainly not a direct copy of the Frog kit. Much as it MIGHT have been used as a master, there are many differences in both detail and consruction. The Merlin looks to be a production F.1, where the Frog is the first prototype (more or less). As models, I agree, not very good, but as collectors items, pure treasure. Nostalgia's not what it used to be!

Pete Trudgett from Blowing Rock NC Flag

Posted at 9:16pm on Saturday, July 24th, 2010

When I was in 807 Sqn. we had A/c with 4 30 mm. a couple with 2 cannon removed to allow instalation of LABS gear used in 'over the shoulder' nuclear delivery and one A/c #190 which was the CO's airplane (Lt. Cdr. Jock Tofts) which had no guns instead had an awful doppler navigation system fitted which required the pilots full sttention in order to keep it working.It was called Blue Silk. My A/c #192 was ditched off of Ark Royal when the guy flying it bolted,dropped his nose,went off the angle on 3 points &a... read more »read more »

Antony Brown from Yorkshire Flag

Posted at 10:14pm on Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Czechmaster have now announced two new 1/72 scale kits for 2010 (see website) which read as if they will be a big improvement, incorporating folded wing options two optional wheel patterns etc.

Michael Hobson from Swindon Flag

Posted at 1:48pm on Monday, March 1st, 2010

When I worked at Supermarine,I don't remember a Scimitar with anything other than 4no.30mm Aden canon. Was a mod. carried out by the Navy?

Johanna-Alice Cooke from Edinburgh Flag

Posted at 10:29pm on Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

I've got three of the 1/72 Scimitars, mainly in an effort to get a decent one to fill the obvious gap in my collection.

The Merlin kit is so basic that there's hardly anything there. That's not necessarily a bad thing if you're prepared to do your homework and a LOT of scratch-building. After doing Merlin's TSR-2, at least the plastic is thick enough to take being reshaped where needed without too many issues. It's still a massive amount of work though.

The Contrail vac-form is one I'd rather have had... read more »read more »

Richard Gault from Dunoon,Argyll Flag

Posted at 7:35pm on Monday, July 20th, 2009

re the Xtrakit.I wholeheartedly agree with the reviewer. What a missed opportunity!
Note that some aircraft did operate with two cannons.Note also that the wheels supplied are the late type.I don't know when they changed but most photos around 1965 seem to have the later style.

Duncan Black from Scotland Flag

Posted at 9:41pm on Friday, April 24th, 2009

Hannants have just announced (April 2009)a new 1/72 scale Scimitar F1. Most likely produced by MPM so should be good quality.

Webmaster response: ...their Sea Vixen and Sea Harrier FA.2 are pretty awful; MPM is not a guarantee of quality I'm afraid.

Add Comment
Your name:
Your email:
Your location:
Country (flag):
Your comments:
 
Loading...