Carrier-borne aircraft operations have always been a dangerous business. With the increase in available speed and weight brought by the development of the jet engine, they were to become even more dangerous. By the close of WWII, the Admiralty had already foreseen that research would be required into the changes necessary during the transition from piston-engined aircraft to jets. One of the more unusual ideas was to save weight and cut down landing accidents by having undercarriage-less aircraft. They would be launched by a special catapult and would land on a flexible rubber deck. Trials were even carried out with a mock deck at Farnborough, using Sea Vampire aircraft. After initial setbacks the concept proved practical - just about, but even so, the Admiralty abandoned the idea. One of the better decisions in UK defence procurement!
Supermarine had been developing a single-seat fighter aircraft to use flexible decks, the type 505. When the Admiralty lost interest, the 505 was modified to use a conventional retractable undercarriage, becoming the type 508. This was a straight-winged twin-engined jet with 'butterfly' (V-shaped) tail (in an attempt to keep the tailplane clear of the jet exhaust and away from the deck). Originally three were to be built, but as always things changed and while the second differed in detail and in having cannons installed (being designated the type 529 as a result), the third underwent a large number of changes with swept wings, a conventional swept tailfin instead of the v-tail and various other changes. This later aircraft looked much more like a Scimitar ancestor, and was designated the type 525. First flown on 27th April 1954, the aircraft provided valuable information for the Scimitar development. A de-navalised version known as the type 526 was offered to the RAF but they were not interested. Then, during a normal test flight on 5th July 1955, the 525 entered a spin at 10,000 ft which deteriorated into a flat spin from which the pilot, Lt. Cdr. Rickell, could not recover. Experiencing problems with jettisoning the canopy and operating the ejector seat, unfortunately he ejected too late and the seat did not have time to separate, nor did the parachute have time to fully deploy - he was killed on impact with the ground. The aircraft was completely destroyed. It would be an indicator of things to come.
The first prototype, the type 544, WT854; Ministry of Supply |
The second N113 prototype, WT859; Vickers |
An order was placed for 100 production aircraft based on the type 525, to be designated N113. Supermarine developed the 525 further, producing the new designation of type 544. The single-seat fighter specification had been changed also; now the aircraft was to be a low level strike aircraft with nuclear capability (no doubt as a result of test pilot reports on the 508/529/525s - which were generally not complimentary about its abilities as a fighter). The fighter/interceptor role would now be fulfilled by the de Havilland DH.110 design. The type 544, like its predecessors, was powered by Rolls Royce Avons and these were, for the time, hugely powerful engines with lots of excess thrust available. Vickers made use of this with a flap blowing system - redirecting part of the high pressure air from the engine through thin slots ahead of the flaps. This delayed the onset of boundary layer separation at low speeds, basically enabling the wing to continue to fly in a stable manner at speeds much lower than normal. This allowed slower - and safer - approach speeds when landing, highly desirable for the demanding business of landing on a tiny carrier deck. The first N113 flew on 19th January 1956 and was quickly followed by two more. Deck trials on HMS Ark Royal began in April but the first two N113s were not particularly representative of the final Scimitar so more trials were planned for early 1957. Meanwhile, trials continued. The power of the twin Avon engines was amply demonstrated when one pilot made a successful take-off with the parking brake still on!
| In January 1957, the more representative 3rd N113, WW134, began trials on Ark Royal. This aircraft was strengthened for the new low-level role and had various aerodynamic 'fixes' applied such as flared-out wingtips and wing fences, to try and counter pitch-up effects at high speed and altitude (similar problems having previously been experienced with the Swift). The tailplane was also changed from having dihedral (angled up) to anhedral (angled down). The N113's powered controls caused some concern when it was realised the high roll rates made possible could cause structural damage. However, the strengthening introduced for the low level role was found to be sufficient to allay these fears. The first Scimitar proper came off the production line in January too, and flew on the 11th. |
N113 WW134 onboard Ark Royal in January 1957 for deck trials |
First production F.1, XD212; via E. B. Morgan |
While the first production Scimitar was retained for some time by Supermarine to continue trials and development, the navy was busy figuring out how best to evaluate the new aircraft. A new unit, 700X Flight (part of 700 NAS), was formed to carry out the task. Deliveries of Scimitars to 700X at Royal Naval Air Station Ford began in August 1957 and the squadron carried out their evaluation task in an intensively noisy fashion until late May 1958. For the residents of this small West Sussex village, the arrival of the hugely powerful Scimitar was an unwelcome shock after the relatively quiet Attackers, Sea Hawks and Gannets they had been used to prior to this point (and about which a near constant stream of complaints were already being received). 700X's intensive flight operations with the type won them few friends with the locals, but enabled a quick and relatively painless introduction of the Scimitar into front line service. The locals ended up with peace and quiet as the air station closed later that year - and an open prison was built on it. Most would have preferred to keep the Scimitars! |
| Early experience with the type found that the view over the nose was generally good but could be improved when in the nose-high landing attitude - the only significant shape change to the airframe was the result, with a slimmer (and considerably more attractive) nose cone being fitted as standard. A similarly styled nose with various cameras could also be fitted for photo reconaissance operations. The first frontline Scimitar squadron to be formed was 803 NAS. After working up at RNAS Lossiemouth and participating in the 1960 Farnborough SBAC show, they embarked on HMS Victorious. Unfortunately, 803's commanding officer was killed in a landing accident when his aircraft went over the side and sank before he could escape, in full view of the assembled press who splashed photos of the trapped pilot over the next day's front pages. While the incident would bring in much improved underwater escape training, it would only be the first in a long line of Scimitar losses (though this first one was due to arrestor wire failure, not a problem with the aircraft). |
XD230 - the first production Scimitar F.1 with guns & radar at RNAS Ford in March 1958 |
F.1 XD278 ready to launch from HMS Ark Royal, 1960; Peter Duhig (who'd love to hear from old shipmates!) |
The Scimitar was, at the time of its introduction, the heaviest and most powerful aircraft ever to serve in the Fleet Air Arm. While innovations such as angled decks helped, the situation with these large and fast aircraft and small aircraft carriers meant that take-offs and landings were an increasingly dangerous business. While the Americans simply built bigger carriers, this luxury was not available to the RN, which was becoming increasingly pressurised to save money, not spend it. The Scimitar's design included a tail bumper so that the aircraft could be rested on it for take-off, with the nosewheel high in the air, actually off the deck. The increased angle of attack meant the less powerful catapults on the RN's small carriers could still manage to bring a heavy (and heavily loaded) aircraft like the Scimitar to flying speed. The margins, however, were tight and there was little room for error. |
| Accidents began to mount up - hydraulic failures, in-flight fires, landing accidents by the dozen, ditchings and plain old crashes. The general consensus these days is that the RN was simply not experienced enough in operating such an advanced and heavy aircraft. The limited size of the carriers also meant that landing accidents became far more serious than they would otherwise have been. In all, 76 Scimitars were actually produced (the last batch of 24 having been cancelled), and no less than 39 were lost in a variety of accidents - an attrition rate of over 51% over the Scimitar's service life! Also worrying was the increasing workload on the single pilot during long low-level strike missions (the two-seat Scimitar having been dropped at an early stage). |
F.1 XD269 goes over the side of HMS Victorious after a brake failure, 10th July 1961 |
Scimitar F.1s of 800 NAS at Farnborough, 1961; J. M. G. Gradidge |
The accidents and workload worries did not, however, stop the Scimitar squadrons from putting on some spectacular airshow appearances. Even in their first year of squadron service, Scimitars put on a stunning show at the 1959 Farnborough SBAC show, which included a variety of role demos including one Scimitar using an extended arrestor hook to pick up a banner target from the runway. The 'twinkle roll' was also born at that show - when aircraft fly in formation and all quickly roll simultaneously. Later shows would see increasingly large formations of Scimitars, with nine being shown off in the 1961 show. The type's early career, before full air to ground weapons fit was approved, involved a lot of 'fun flying - relatively light weight payloads, a high performance jet and the whole ethos of the elite single seat fighter set meant a Scimitar posting was a glamorous and sought-after job. |
| Scimitars never saw any action, though they did help prevent a possible war when the Royal Navy was sent to the Gulf to block the increasingly hostile Iraqis from invading Kuwait in 1961. They were also prepared for a basic ground attack role using guns only in the Indonesian campaign. Trials work with various weapon types saw a succession of lethal objects hung underneath Scimitars including 2 and 3 inch unguided rockets, 500 and 1000 lb bombs, AGM-45 Bullpup air to ground guided missiles (described by pilots as great fun, but utterly useless as a weapon of war due to the requirement to fly along after it once fired to guide it, thus putting the aircraft into just as much danger as simply going in and bombing the target) and AIM-9 Sidewinder air to air missiles for self-defence (the Sea Vixen was entering service by now and taking over the fighter role). The carriage of a single nuclear bomb - the nominally 2,000 lb (actually 1,750 lb) Red Beard - was also trialled successfully, and practice of the appropriate release techniques with dummy 'shapes' was carried out from time to time, and also regularly practiced with much smaller practice bombs. The real weapons were never flown by carrier-based Scimitars, as the risks of a take off or landing accident were felt to be too high to risk 'live' practice sorties in peacetime - indeed the weapons were stored in component form aboard the carriers for safety, and permission to assemble them was never given in peacetime. Each aircraft carrier rarely had more than a handful of such weapons. |
Scimitar F.1 XD235; via Zvi Kreisler |
Scimitar F.1 plans |
Soon, however, the increasing difficulty of the low-level attack role with what was a fairly basic navigation system, and the type's mounting losses meant that the navy relegated the Scimitar to 2nd-line duties while the much more capable Blackburn Buccaneer was brought into service. The Buccaneer Mk.1's underpowered engines meant that early Buccaneers could not take off with a full load of fuel and weapons, so Scimitars were used to provide 'buddy' refuelling; that way the Buccaneers could take off with minimum fuel and save their precious thrust for carrying a respectable weapon load! Other duties for Scimitars in their last months of service were towing target banners, providing radar targets for calibration of ground-based radar sets and a myriad of other unglamorous but essential roles. The last frontline squadron (803 NAS) relinquished their Scimitars in October 1966. The Fleet Requirements Unit (FRU, later FRADU) operated Scimitars using civilian pilots for a time too; from 1965 to the end of 1970. So it was that December 1970 saw the last flight of the last Supermarine fighter. |
Despite the appalling accident rate, the Scimitar was generally well thought of by its pilots and has been described by many as 'a delight to fly' - at least below 25,000 ft - above that, the limitations that gave it a very short life in the fighter role became painfully apparent and handling was much less carefree than at low level. Scimitar maintainers did not have to undergo the pain of some of their RAF counterparts on types such as the Lightning; though the complex fuel system generated leaks by the dozen and hydraulic problems kept them busy, in general the type was straightforward to maintain. It was certainly a more successful design than Supermarine's other swept wing jet - the Swift.
| Variant | Type 508 | Type 529 | Type 525 | Type 544/N113D | F.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First flight | 31 Aug 1951 | 29 Aug 1952 | 27 Apr 1954 | 19 Jan 56 | 11 Jan 1957 |
| Crew | One | ||||
| Armament | None | Four 30mm cannon | None | Four 30mm cannon, up to four 1,000lb bombs or four AGM-45 Bullpup AGMs or four AIM-9 Sidewinder AAMs; 2" or 3" rockets, 2,000lb Red Beard nuclear bomb | |
| Powerplant | 2 x 6,500 lb Rolls-Royce Avon RA 3 | 2 x 7,500 lb RR Avon RA7 | 2 x 10,000 lb RR Avon RA24 | 2 x 10,000 lb RR Avon RA24/26, later 11,500 lb Avon 200 series | |
| Max. speed | 524 kt / 0.89 Mach | 562 kt / 0.954 Mach | 640 kt / 0.968 Mach | ||
| Service ceiling | 50,000 ft | ? | 46,000 ft | ||
| Range | ? | 1,422 miles | |||
| Empty weight | 18,850 lb | 19,910 lb | 23,962 lb | ||
| Max. take off weight | 25,630 lb | 28,169 lb | 34,200 lb | ||
| Wing span | 41 ft | 37 ft 2 in | |||
| Wing area | 340 sq ft | 450 sq ft | 484.9 sq ft | ||
| Length * | 50 ft | 50 ft 6 in | 53 ft 0.4 in | 55 ft 3 in | |
| Height * | 12 ft 4 in | 14 ft 11 in | 17 ft 4 in | ||
| Production | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 76 |
* Lengths vary with type of nose cone (notably early aircraft with instrumentation boom, and whether IFR probe fitted or not). Heights are for with wings unfolded.
Visitor Comments
32 people have commented on this page. This is comment section 1 of 4.
Robert Miles from Auckland
Posted at 1:00am on Friday, January 20th, 2012
The article credits the fundamental problem with the Scimitar being too small-which would have been even more of a problem with the Eagle in refit 59-64. But the Scimitar also lacked modern radar and navigation and therefore would probably been ineffective as a day fighter or striker. Surely a version of the Vixen with gun and 2/4 sidewinders would have done the job better. The use of 20 flying prototypes with both the Vixen and Buccs was essential and was not done with the Scimitar. An interesting question... read more »read more »
Gerry Mogg from UK
Posted at 1:12pm on Sunday, November 27th, 2011
To John Bradley: (re your post of 19 June 2011): The plane was in a flat spin directly over our house in Salisbury in July 1955. I was very young at the time, but clearly recall watching and hearing from the garden, as it was coming down in a spin directly overhead. I ran in to hide, but my sibling saw and heard it crash in the nearby river/ watermeadows. The word was that the pilot deliberately stayed at the controls until managing to veer it away from the houses (including his own!) directly below, at the... read more »read more »
John Waller (Wol) from Somerset
Posted at 10:27pm on Thursday, November 3rd, 2011
Served in the FAA first squadron after traning 736 RNAS Lossiemouth Scimitars,I did not go front lime as I was claimed by my older brother who was serving at RNAS Yeovilton he was serving on 893 Sea Vixens which was now on HMS Victorious so I was flown out to Singapore BOAC missed the ship so was was flown to Hong Kong (Crab Air) joined HMS Victorious on searcing for my brother was informed he had been flown home on compassionate leave a couple of days ago
Phil Sirett from Oxford, UK
Posted at 4:07pm on Sunday, October 30th, 2011
George Brooks from Warrington.
I was a member of 800 NAS Scimitars, embarked on the Ark during 1960.
The propeller aircraft were 849A Flight AEW Gannets, and the choppers were Whirlwind 7 from 820 and 824 squadron.
The parade on the Flight deck was standard when the ship was visiting a foreign port, this could have been almost any place in the Med where we spent most of 1960
Malcolm Milham from Boadstairs
Posted at 9:08pm on Monday, July 11th, 2011
I served on Victorious 1958/60, Intercept officers assistant working with 803 RNAS. Can anyone tell me landing and launch speeds please
George Brooks from Warrington
Posted at 10:39pm on Tuesday, June 28th, 2011
My interest in the Scimitar arises from a framed photograph of HMS Ark Royal with a full compliment of aircraft and crew on the flight deck. This photo only came into my possession today, courtesy of a local charity shop my wife was visiting. The aerial view taken from the stern shows each type grouped together with 4 prop driven aircraft at the extreme stern, in front of them are 6 Sea Vixen 5 helicopters and a continuous line of 10,what I now know are Scimitars. The photograph could have belonged to an ex... read more »read more »
John Bradley from Pewsey Wiltshire
Posted at 11:18pm on Friday, June 10th, 2011
I was an apprentice at Supermarine from 1954 to 58 and worked on Swift and Scimitar production as well as on the Type 545 that never flew.I was at the Itchen works, Eastleigh Flight Shed, and Hursley Park. I also did some work on the Type 525 XV 138 that later crashed in July 55. I thought it crashed in the New Forest, close to my parent's home (the site where I thought it crashed is still visible today) but another source said it was at Idmiston near Boscombe Down where it was based. Does anybody definite... read more »read more »
John Waller from Somerset
Posted at 8:37pm on Friday, May 27th, 2011
Joined RN 1963 first draft after tech training RNAS Lossiemouth 736 squadron at the time operating Scimitars. Fond memories of aircraft and messmates.
John Waller (Wol)
Ian Vincent from southampton
Posted at 10:16pm on Thursday, May 19th, 2011
My dad worked at Eastleigh on Scimitar inner wings I worked on fusealage construction at woolston works as a 3 rd year appentice great days and climbing in the rear end access radio bay was soo tight drilling the door pins etc taking a little break on the shop floor whilst Mr woodley was on the balcony surveting the works how times have changed
Don Owens from Bridgend, s Wales
Posted at 10:18am on Monday, April 4th, 2011
I, too, was at Fleetlands at the time of John Hunter's entry. I was probably in the hydraulic section in D shop at the time so I hope I wasn't responsible for the hydraulic problems! When the first repaired Scimiter flew off to Boscombe Down for flight testing. Lee-on Solent's runway wasn't long enough to return, we were told that the Ferry Pilot would overfly Fleetlands at 11.00 o'clock. When he came over at very low altitude he flipped on to his side and flew down the main road to F Shop then, presumably ... read more »read more »