Thunder & Lightnings

McDonnell-Douglas/BAC F-4K/M Phantom II


History Survivors Profiles Gallery Walkaround Models Links, References & Credits

The history of the Phantom in UK service is what will be covered here; other web sites cover the basic aircraft in much detail and I see little point in duplicating that effort.

P.1154(RN) artist's impression
Artist's impression of the P.1154(RN); BAE Systems
The Royal Navy's initial plans in the 1960s were to replace their Sea Vixens with a supersonic VTOL type, the Hawker P.1154RN. This was a navalised variant of the P.1154 which the RAF wanted to replace their Hunters with. The RN wasn't entirely happy with this, and what they wanted - a two seat interceptor - differed somewhat from what the RAF wanted - a single seat ground attack/recce type. A design with a single engine and predicted service date of 1968 also worried the RN. It was no mistake that McDonnell-Douglas popped into RNAS Yeovilton with their new F-4B in 1961 on the way back from the Paris air show; they also produced documents with titles such as 'F-4 in Royal Navy Service' and pushed the benefits of the aircraft - it was available right now, and it would be cheaper than the P.1154.
Fast forward to 1964, and the P.1154RN was cancelled; the RN had made their mind up and wanted the F-4 instead. Later that year the new Labour government came to power and also cancelled the RAF's P.1154 and TSR.2, leaving the RAF with no Hunter replacement, and no Canberra replacement. Suddenly the F-4 was looking much more attractive. Biting the bullet and ordering the F-4, the MoD did at least get agreement to re-engine the aircraft with Rolls-Royce Speys, and to have parts of the aircraft built in the UK - e.g. BAC would build the rear fuselage, Ferranti would build the radars (though the American design would be kept). Based upon the F-4J, two UK versions of the Phantom II were produced. The Royal Navy was to receive the F-4K, and the RAF were to get the F-4M. YF-4K XT595
The first RN F-4 - YF-4K XT595 on its first flight, 27th June 1966; Boeing
YF-4M XT582, 1967
The first RAF F-4 - YF-4M XT582 during a test flight in 1967; Boeing
The F-4K, the RN's carrier variant, needed to be made compatible with the RN's carriers, which were rather undersized in comparison with their US counterparts. The entire nose radome needed to fold 180 degrees in order to fit the aircraft onto the deck lifts; the nose leg needed to be extendable so that the aircraft could sit with the nose much higher at take-off in order to reduce the amount of wind needed over the deck at launch. Larger flaps, drooping ailerons and slatted tailplanes were also required to improve take-off performance. Thankfully some of these additions were already being introduced in the F-4J. The RAF, however, would have been quite happy with a standard F-4 and looked upon all the additions - including Speys - as being completely unnecessary, and using up valuable time and money that could have been used to finance a larger purchase.

On paper, using Speys looked like a great idea, as they were more powerful than the J79s fitted normally, and more fuel-efficient. However, it would not be an easy match. The engine bays needed to be enlarged, and the rear fuselage redesigned to cope with the slight exhaust down-angle needed to further improve take-off performance. Speys required a greater flow of air so the intakes had to be enlarged and even then auxiliary intake doors had to be introduced on the fuselage just forward of the tail. All of this work took so much money and time that the supposed off-the-shelf cheap buy was turning into a protracted and expensive procurement. The benefits of greater thrust and fuel economy were also practically negated by the higher drag caused by the enlarged fuselage. Acceleration at low altitude was improved; however at high altitude the F-4J performed better. Happily for the pilots of UK F-4s, the Speys were significantly less smoky than the J79s, so a British F-4 was at least trickier to acquire visually!

The first three F-4Ks (or FG.1s as they were designated by the UK) were delivered to RNAS Yeovilton in Somerset in April 1968 and these formed No.700P Intensive Flying Trials Unit along with three more examples delivered later. In January of the next year trials had progressed far enough for the FAA to be able to form a training unit, and so 767 NAS was commissioned. With only 28 FG.1s available to the Navy, there would only be enough for a single front line squadron in addition to the training squadron and trials unit. 892 NAS, formed in March, would therefore be the Navy's only front-line Phantom operator. While 892 worked up, 700P underwent carrier trials on HMS Eagle and the USS Saratoga, a traumatic experience for the American carrier which suffered burnt and buckled deck plating from the higher thrust of the Spey engines. Eagle and Ark Royal would need water-cooled blast deflectors and deck plates and in the event only the Ark received this upgrade. The new type's first public appearance was made by a 700P example at the 1968 Farnborough show where the massive thrust of its Speys certainly made an impression on the crowd. FG.1 XT873
FG.1 XT873 of 767 NAS at RNAS Yeovilton, Sep 1969; CA Griggs collection
FG.1 XT865 launching
FG.1 XT865 of 892 NAS catapults from Ark Royal; MoD(RN)
Unfortunately for the Royal Navy, their plans of operating 140 Phantoms on HMS Ark Royal, HMS Eagle and the new super-carrier CVA-01 were dealt a massive blow when the government cancelled the new carrier, and the plans for refurbishing existing carriers. Only Ark Royal would be modernised and the order for F-4Ks was cut again and again until only 48 examples were ordered - and 20 of these were diverted to the RAF! The RAF were also receiving their first Phantoms, the examples diverted from the RN's order. In fact some of the 767 NAS FG.1s were delivered in RAF camouflage instead of Navy markings as they were intended to move to RAF use so soon. 892 knew this too and suspecting they would be the last fixed-wing type to equip the FAA (proved wrong in 1980 with the introduction of the Sea Harrier), their squadron marking was a large Omega symbol on a white diamond placed on a red fin flash.
So, procured for the worst of reasons but perhaps with the best intentions, the Phantom entered service with the RN and RAF. Prompting one admiral to ask if it had been delivered upside-down, the aircraft could never be described as a looker and in fact one of its nicknames was "Double Ugly"! HMS Eagle saw a brief period of Phantom trial operations in the English Channel, but most FAA Phantom flying was initially from their home base at Yeovilton with detachments to RAE Bedford and its dummy carrier deck facilities. 892 gained their 15 minutes of fame when one of their Phantoms won the Daily Mail's Transatlantic Air Race in May 1969 (commemorating the 50th anniversary of Alcock and Brown's crossing of the Atlantic). In the process they set a record for flight time from New York to London - 4 hours 46 minutes and 57 seconds. Once HMS Ark Royal was ready in 1970, Phantoms from 892 NAS were embarked and serious operations could begin, with jets from 767 also using the carrier for practice. All too soon though 767 was disbanded - with the Phantom training task passing to the RAF in 1972. RN Phantoms moved in this year too, from RNAS Yeovilton to RAF Leuchars. RAF hand-over
Group Captain Stanley Mason receives the RAF's first F-4, FGR.2 XT891, at RAF Aldergrove, 20th July 1968; Mirror Syndication International
F-4 can-opener
FGR.2 XV432 of 6 Sqn, 1970; MoD(RAF) via Garry Lakin
The RAF, meanwhile, had been busy forming a number of Phantom squadrons. RAF Coningsby was to be home for the greatest number of them - 228 OCU was first, forming in August 1968. Following them, 6 Squadron in May 1969, 54 Squadron in September 1969 and 41 Squadron in April 1972. Leuchars saw a single squadron - 43 - being formed in September 1969. RAF Bruggen in Germany saw the formation of 14 and 17 Squadrons in July 1970, 2 Squadron in December 1970 and 31 Squadron in July 1971. While the RAF Germany F-4s were only minutes away from the Soviet border, Lightnings continued to guard the frontier, and the RAFG Phantoms were tasked with ground attack and interdiction as well as reconaissance. The 'R' in 'FGR.2' was really a bit of a misnomer, as only 30 or so Phantoms were actually equipped with the wiring necessary to use the big EMI recce pods. While 2 Squadron worked up, the Hunter FR.10s they were previously equipped with were, unusually, kept in service - so effectively there were two seperate 2 Squadrons in operation! This sort of thing soon became common in order that the strength of the NATO-declared RAF forces in Germany never diminished while new equipment (particularly the later Jaguar) was introduced.
43 Squadron up at RAF Leuchars had much longer flight times to deal with than the RAFG squadrons. The Phantom was better suited to long-range interceptions over the North Sea than the then-prevalent Lightnings, and 43 Squadron's birds were soon regularly intercepting Soviet intruders (in cooperation with Shackletons and RN Gannets from Lossiemouth) and preparing the way for the gradual phase-out of the Lightning in this role. 43 Squadron were joined by the Phantom Training Flight, also using FG.1s diverted from the RN Phantom order. While the FAA's operations very gradually ran down, RAF squadrons continued to be formed, with 19, 23, 29, 56, 92 and 111 Squadrons joining the fun between 1973 and 1976, the height of UK Phantom operations. Rhino versus Bear
FG.1 XV574 of 43 Sqn holding back the Russian Bear; MoD(RAF) via Garry Lakin
Two 56 Sqn FGR.2s patrolling the North Sea
Two 56 Sqn FGR.2s patrolling the North Sea; MoD(RAF) via Garry Lakin
With increasing recognition that the Phantom was much better suited than the Lightning to defending the UK's airspace and the surprise success of the Jaguar programme, RAF Germany in particular began to lose its Phantoms, which were re-tasked with air defence while Jaguars took over the ground attack and recce roles. Revenge of a sort was had when one Phantom shot down a Jaguar over Germany - it was, of course, an accident. So the story goes, anyway! Moving swiftly on... several Phantom squadrons converted to Jaguars - 6, 14, 17, 31, 41 and 54 all disbanding and reforming with Jags between 1974 and 1977. RAF Coningsby had always been the primary RAF Phantom station, and most of the newer squadrons had been formed there. While the Jaguars had ended Coltishall's days as a Lightning station, the Phantom put paid to its days at Wattisham also, leaving only Leuchars and Binbrook operating English Electric's finest. Even then its days at Leuchars were numbered and with 23 Squadron's reformation as a Phantom squadron, the Lightning was to be found only at Binbrook, where it filled a gap left by the still- insufficient number of Phantoms. Therefore, the government's cost-cutting in the 1960s ensured the Lightning soldiered on longer that it really should have done - every cloud has a silver lining!
1978 saw the final withdrawal of the RN's Phantoms, with HMS Ark Royal paying off, destined for the scrapyard. 892's FG.1s remained at Leuchars but passed to RAF charge with 111 Squadron who passed their FGR.2s onto other squadrons. Settling down to their tasking of UK air defence, the RAF's claims to be able to defend the RN fleet were soon to be proved to be a nonsense when in 1982 the Argentines invaded the Falkland Islands, a British territory in the South Atlantic. With Ark Royal already reduced to saucepans, there was no way to intervene until the RN's smaller 'Harrier carriers' reached the area, and RAF Phantoms (a small detachment from 29 Squadron) were limited to defending the staging post at Ascension Island, lacking the range to cover the huge distances involved. The folly of the the retirement of the RN's big carriers would soon cost lives, and perhaps more importantly for the bean counters in government, it would cost them several big expensive ships. FG.1 XV587 of 43 Sqn
FG.1 XV587 of 43 Sqn, 1986; Paul Nann
F.3 ZE355 making noise over RAF Akrotiri; Tom McGhee
With Britain's victory in the Falklands, the airstrip at Port Stanley - the islands' capital - was upgraded to enable temporary Phantom operations while a serious station - RAF Mount Pleasant - was being constructed. 23 Squadron moved from Wattisham to Stanley in March 1983, taking over from the 29 Squadron detachment. This left a gaping hole in the UK's own air defence and adding to that delays in the Tornado ADV programme and the unexpectedly high amounts of fatigue life expended by the RAF's Phantoms when used in the ground attack role, the MoD soon realised it was in desperate need of some more aircraft. In the usual "You couldn't make it up" style of procurement, the RAF ended up buying some more Phantoms - off-the-shelf F-4Js recently retired by the US Navy! After all the fuss of producing UK specific versions, the best performing UK-operated Phantoms would turn out to be more or less stock F-4Js with only minor modifications made. They even had improved J79 engines, reducing the famous Phantom smoke trail to levels similar to those of the Spey-equipped F-4Ks and F-4Ms. Designated as F.3s, this didn't really catch on and they were more usually referred to simply as F-4J(UK)s.
In 1986 23 Squadron once again to the new station of RAF Mount Pleasant, but by 1988 had been reduced to a flight of only four aircraft (and redesignated as 1435 Flight) in anticipation of immiment replacement by Tornado ADVs. Binbrook's Lightnings were also retired and replaced by Tornados. In 1989, 43 Squadron disbanded, re-equipping with the Tornado F.2, and 111 Squadron went the same way in 1990. By 1990 some of the F-4Js were becoming increasingly tired and several had been grounded to be robbed for spares, and it was decided to retire them as quickly as possible, replacing them with FGR.2s from the squadrons that had disbanded. In the middle of all this, however, Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait and RAF Phantoms had their second chance of some action. Unfortunately for the Phantom force, they were relegated to guarding Cyprus - an important tasking, but lacking any opportunity to bag some bad guys. The Tornado force, it seemed, had been given the juicier deployment to Saudi Arabia. Of course, they never bagged any bad guys either, so the new boys never had a chance to rag the Phantom squadrons about it! RAF Scampton servicing, 1988
XT852 being serviced by BAe, RAF Scampton, 1988; Kev Darling
74 Sqn FGR.2 taking off
A 74 Sqn FGR.2 takes off from RAF Wattisham, March 1992; Allan Barley
By 1991 the UK Phantom force had been reduced to four squadrons, all based at RAF Wattisham. 92 Squadron disbanded in July; 19 Squadron disbanded in January 1992. 56 Squadron were next, in June. With only 74 Squadron left, the outskirts of Wattisham were scattered with retired aircraft, many marked with a blue cross to let the satellites of the former Soviet Union verify that the aircraft were out of use. The end of an era was marked on 1st October 1992, when 74 Squadron performed their final formation flypast, and Wattisham fell silent.
There would, sadly, be one final chapter in the UK Phantom story, and it is not a happy ending. Ludicrously despite being partly manufactured by UK firms, and bought with UK taxpayer's money, the USA had stipulated that the aircraft could not be disposed of to non-government organisations. Thus an important part of the UK's aviation history has for the most part been reduced to scrap despite museums across the country crying out for a chance to exhibit an example of this powerful aircraft. A few have somehow escaped the bureaucratic edicts from above, but it is a small number. Most that were not immediately scrapped on retirement have succumbed to the scrapman's attentions in the years since, the final mean-spirited act in the story of the UK's Phantoms. RAF Wattisham dump, 1992
RAF Wattisham dump, March 1992; Allan Barley

Leading Particulars

First flight 27 Jun 1966 (prototype)
08 Jun 1967 (production)
17 Feb 1967 (prototype)
25 Apr 1956 (production)
10 Aug 1984
Crew Two
Armament Four AIM-9 Sidewinder AAMs, four AIM-7 Sparrow or Skyflash AAMs, 1 SUU-23/A Cannon Pod, various bombs & rockets
Powerplant Two 20,515 lb Rolls-Royce Spey 203s Two 20,515 lb Rolls-Royce Spey 202/204s Two 17,900 lb J-79-GE-10Bs
Max. speed 1,386 mph at 40,000 ft / 1.9 mach at altitude 1,434 mph at 40,000 ft / 2.1 mach at altitude
Service ceiling 57,200 ft 61,900 ft
Range 1,750 miles
Empty weight 31,000 lb 29,900 lb
Max. take off weight 58,000 lb
Wing span 38 ft 5 in
Wing area 530 sq ft
Length 57 ft 7 in 58 ft 3 in
Height 16 ft 1 in16 ft 9 in (with RWR)16 ft 6 in
Production (total 185) 52 (including 2 prototypes) 118 (including 2 prototypes) 15 (all ex-US for RAF use)

Production totals for the F.3 variant are only for those F-4Js converted ot F-4J(UK) standard - many more F-4Js were built. Corrections and gap-filling welcome as always!

Share via Twitter   Facebook   Email   Other

Site contents copyright © 2016 Damien Burke/Handmade by Machine Ltd.
This page last updated on Thursday 12th April 2012

Visitor Comments

20 people have commented on this page. This is comment section 1 of 2.

Robert McLean from N.Ireland

Postd at 12:47pm on Monday, February 16th, 2015

Worked on the Phantoms at 23MU Aldergrove,kneeling below the F4 running at full power at the attenuator was an experience never to be forgotten. That was forty years ago, glad to have been part of it.

John Holden from Jacksonville, Fl

Postd at 1:18am on Saturday, January 10th, 2015

I was a tech rep and instructor for Westinghouse Defense Systems. We built the radar system for the Phantoms. I was assigned to England during the transition of the F4K and M. I spent time at Yoevil, Holme, and Boscomb. 1967-70. Enjoyed the duty very much. Love England.


Postd at 6:31pm on Sunday, December 14th, 2014

Chris Harrell ,remember you well/I was on 892 as well and used to play football with you at Yeovilton{Airworks} Yes I loved the old F4 even got the scars on the head from the sidewinders to prove it

Donald Grant from Kent, England.

Postd at 7:33pm on Tuesday, November 4th, 2014

I watched the first RAF aircraft being delivered to Aldergrove from the control tower. My Dad was an air traffic controller and I was 11years old! Loved the aircraft ever since.

Chris Harrell from Thailand

Postd at 7:27pm on Friday, August 8th, 2014

Joined PTF at RAF(RNAS) Leuchars in July 76, after SAMCO's and type training joined 892 in May 77 and was very sad to leave 892 and the Ark Royal in December 78. Great times with magnificent people. Thanks for an informative website. Was first involved with the Phantom at Yeovilton in 1971 working on the salvage section, maintaining the arrestor gear, PUAG and Sprag and also the Barriers. Single engine failures were especially sporty at the PUAG site as the aircrafts landing speed was significantly higher t... read more »read more »

Troy Ledbetter from Garland,Tx

Postd at 8:15am on Tuesday, July 1st, 2014

I worked on the runway with F4s in the USMC, recovering them. Being so close was always always exciting. My favorite job was working point because I was right on the edge of the runway. Having the beast land, coming at you at 150 MPH, going to full throttle temporarily was always an attention getter and that was during the day! Night ops were even better!

Ricky Gilbert from Chesterfild

Postd at 11:41pm on Friday, April 18th, 2014

It was the phantom that made me want to join The R. A. F. As a young boy I would marvel at this splendid aircraft dreaming of flying the phantom but sadly due to medical and eyesight problems I neither got the chance to fly a plane or even join the R. A. F. However I still envy the lucky ones that got to fly these wonderfull aircraft.

Lionel A from Fareham. Hants

Postd at 7:18pm on Tuesday, January 21st, 2014

Ian Kavanagh.

That the Spey was fitted to the UK Phantoms for reasons of increased power for the shorter catapult run and also the aircraft accelerated quicker and had longer endurance than with the J79. USN and Marine F4s were launched from Ark during cross operating but at lighter loads than would otherwise have been the case with a fully laden F4k (FG1).

I attended a Phatom Spey makers Maintenance and Troubleshooting course at RR Derby and then a airfarme SAMCO (Short Aircraft Maintenance Course) a... read more »read more »

Ian Kavanagh from Liverpool

Postd at 10:14am on Friday, December 6th, 2013

I heard the Speys were put in the Phantom because the extra thrust was required to get them off the smaller, and slower, British carriers, and not because of some 'Buy British' attitude. Any truth in that? Also, would a J79 F4 have managed to get off the deck of HMS Ark Royal/Eagle? I only ask because in comparing their catapult take off length and landing runway to the American carriers, but not the overall deck space, they seem to be the same.

John Borwick from sutton surrey

Postd at 12:10pm on Wednesday, August 7th, 2013

Please can you tell me the fate of XT901 tail Y ex 56 Sqn. Many thanks. John.

Add Comment
Your name:
Your email:
Your location:
Country (flag):
Your comments: